View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000982 | luatex | luatex bug | public | 2016-08-17 15:46 | 2016-08-28 14:55 |
Reporter | juliangilbey | Assigned To | Hans Hagen | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
Platform | Linux | OS | Debian | OS Version | testing |
Product Version | 0.87.0 | ||||
Summary | 0000982: Integral limits placement is somewhat poor in displayed integrals with unicode-math | ||||
Description | (This is actually version 0.95.0, but that's not offered in the dropdown menu.) The integral limits are placed quite a distance from the integral when unicode-math is used. (Using unicode-math version [2015/09/24 v0.8c Unicode maths in XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX].) | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | The following minimal file shows the behaviour: \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{unicode-math} \begin{document} $\int_0^1 x$ $$\int_0^1 x$$ \end{document} I ran it without the usepackage line and then with it, and joined the two PDF files together to give the attached document. The same behaviour occurs on a Mac OSX system running TeX Live 2016. | ||||
Additional Information | I have also reported this as https://github.com/wspr/unicode-math/issues/364 in case it is actually a unicode-math issue. Thanks! | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
|
afaiks it works ok (cf spec the superscript gets + ic/2 and the subscript - ic/2) |
|
|
|
Hi Hans, That's interesting. If I add the line: \setmathfont{xits-math} to the preamble, then the result is as attached (integrals-stix.pdf), and the displayed integral has the 0 very far to the right. Is this, then, a font design issue? Best wishes, Julian |
|
i checked with latin modern, dejavu, cambria, lucidaot and xits and all are more or less the same but indeed stix (large) integrals are more sloped and then this italic correction does not compensate enough for the subscript (as with latin modern) indeed there can be font issues: most fonts lack the advanced kerning that opentype provides but in due time that will be fixed of course i have no clue what latex does internally but that can also play a role here |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2016-08-17 15:46 | juliangilbey | New Issue | |
2016-08-17 15:46 | juliangilbey | File Added: integrals.pdf | |
2016-08-17 17:05 | Hans Hagen | Note Added: 0001625 | |
2016-08-19 09:14 | juliangilbey | File Added: integrals-stix.pdf | |
2016-08-19 09:16 | juliangilbey | Note Added: 0001626 | |
2016-08-19 09:38 | Hans Hagen | Note Added: 0001627 | |
2016-08-19 09:40 | Hans Hagen | Note Edited: 0001627 | |
2016-08-28 14:55 | Hans Hagen | Status | new => closed |
2016-08-28 14:55 | Hans Hagen | Assigned To | => Hans Hagen |
2016-08-28 14:55 | Hans Hagen | Resolution | open => no change required |