View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000410 | luatex | feature request | public | 2010-05-29 20:58 | 2015-10-29 15:11 |
Reporter | Taco | Assigned To | Hans Hagen | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Target Version | 0.90.0 | Fixed in Version | 0.85.0 | ||
Summary | 0000410: Unicode character large operator subtypes | ||||
Description | From Aditya: >> BTW, in both solution ?_a acts like \int\limits_a, not \int_a. > > In plain TeX, this is taken care by > > \mathchardef\intop="1352 \def\int{\intop\nolimits} > > Can I do the same in luatex without active characters? No, but it is a useful extension to consider. There are internally three types of large operators, for 'limits', 'nolimits' and 'displaylimits' and this bothers me a bit. We can't reasonably extend the old primitives, but \Umathcharcode c.s. could be made to accept extra values '9' .. '11' for those three types without any compatibility problems. | ||||
Tags | math | ||||
|
Can't be done quickly because the values are passed around in cur_val which is limited to 32 bits. |
|
redone |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2010-05-29 20:58 | Taco | New Issue | |
2010-05-29 20:58 | Taco | Status | new => assigned |
2010-05-29 20:58 | Taco | Assigned To | => Taco |
2010-07-28 10:47 | Taco | Note Added: 0000566 | |
2011-04-12 11:09 | Taco | Target Version | 0.70.0 => 0.80.0 |
2012-04-09 04:56 | Khaled Hosny | Tag Attached: math | |
2015-10-24 21:29 | Hans Hagen | Assigned To | Taco => Hans Hagen |
2015-10-25 11:42 | Hans Hagen | Target Version | 0.80.0 => 0.90.0 |
2015-10-29 15:11 | Hans Hagen | Note Added: 0001491 | |
2015-10-29 15:11 | Hans Hagen | Status | assigned => closed |
2015-10-29 15:11 | Hans Hagen | Resolution | open => fixed |
2015-10-29 15:11 | Hans Hagen | Fixed in Version | => 0.85.0 |