View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000314 | luatex | luatex bug | public | 2010-01-06 16:29 | 2010-03-16 21:00 |
| Reporter | Taco | Assigned To | Taco | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 0.50.0 | ||||
| Target Version | 0.60.0 | Fixed in Version | 0.52.0 | ||
| Summary | 0000314: Problem with a .pk file | ||||
| Description | From Élie Roux: this plain TeX minimal example shows different output when compiled with pdfTeX and LuaTeX (0.50): \font\toto=frca10 at 10pt\toto ligature \bye the frca10 comes from the package frcursive (http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/frcursive/), present in TeX Live 2009. The pdf contains ligat when compiled with LuaTeX and ligature when compiled with pdfTeX. Is it a problem in the .tfm/.pk file or is it a bug in LuaTeX? | ||||
| Additional Information | Something is wrong in luatex: the routine that inserts the discretionaries has a problem with the massive amount of ligatures in the frca10 font. I will add a tracker item, but it may take a while to fix this. (the 'ure' bit ends up in the postbreak of the final discretionary, see log in attached test suite) | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-01-06 16:29 | Taco | New Issue | |
| 2010-01-06 16:29 | Taco | Status | new => assigned |
| 2010-01-06 16:29 | Taco | Assigned To | => Taco |
| 2010-01-06 16:29 | Taco | File Added: frca-test.zip | |
| 2010-02-19 15:08 | Taco | Target Version | => 0.60.0 |
| 2010-03-15 12:13 | Taco | Note Added: 0000484 | |
| 2010-03-15 12:13 | Taco | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2010-03-15 12:13 | Taco | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2010-03-16 20:59 | Taco | Fixed in Version | => 0.52.0 |
| 2010-03-16 21:00 | Taco | Status | resolved => closed |
